Protecting Nonprofit Nonpartisanship
For more than 60 years, an important provision in the federal tax code has successfully protected charitable nonprofits, religious congregations, and foundations from being hounded by politicians, political operatives, and paid political consultants seeking political endorsements, financial contributions, and more. That provision is threatened now by the House-passed appropriations bill, and previously in the House-passed tax reform bill, seeking to completely repeal or substantially weaken this longstanding protection in the law. Although couched as attempts to promote religious freedom and free speech, the legislative proposals would have the effect of politicizing and thereby erasing the public’s high trust in charities, houses of worship, and foundations to benefit politicians and paid political consultants.
Community Letter in Support of Nonpartisanship
A broad, nationwide coalition of 501(c)(3) organizations, made up of charitable nonprofits, including religious institutions and foundations, delivered a clear message to Congress: maintain the current law that protects nonprofits organizations from being hounded for partisan political contributions and endorsements. The Community Letter in Support of Nonpartisanship, signed by more than 5,600 organizations from every state and every segment of the charitable and foundation communities, declares strong support for nonprofit nonpartisanship and urges those who have vowed to repeal or weaken this vital protection to leave existing law in place for nonprofit organizations and the people they serve.
Individuals can support nonpartisanship and help defeat efforts in Congress to repeal or weaken current protections in the law (known as the “Johnson Amendment”) by forwarding the Community Letter in Support of Nonpartisanship to their U.S. Senators and Representatives. Individuals and organizations are invited to spread the word on social media as well. (Sample Tweet: #Nonprofits are effective because they focus on #CommunityNotCandidates. Maintain #JohnsonAmendment http://bit.ly/2nV6SQI)
UPDATE (January 3, 2018):
The spending bill that Congress will be taking up in January could include a provision that would politicize charitable nonprofits, houses of worship, and foundations, and undermine nonprofit effectiveness in our communities. The spending bill could do this by blocking enforcement of the Johnson Amendment, the longstanding law that protects 501(c)(3) organizations from demands from candidates for public office and their donors for political endorsements and other campaign involvement.
Similar efforts to politicize the nonprofit community were thwarted on the tax bill last month and well-funded partisan interests have vowed to push even harder to repeal or weaken the Johnson Amendment in the upcoming appropriations bill that must be enacted by January 19.
If enacted, the provision would have politicized charitable nonprofits, houses of worship and foundations by plunging them into the caustic partisanship that bedevils our country. Notably, the proposal would have encouraged creation of sham organizations, divert contributions from other nonprofits to fund partisan churches, and bring discredit to the broad charitable nonprofit community. This change to the Johnson Amendment would be contrary to the views of the vast majority of organizations that benefit from the law, as reflected in the Community Letter in Support of Nonpartisanship, signed by more than 5,600 organizations in all 50 states, in the Faith Voices letter signed by more than 4,200 faith leaders, in the separate letter signed by more than 100 denominations and major religious organizations, and the law enforcement community, as well as polls showing that 72 percent of the public support keeping the Johnson Amendment in place and nearly 90 percent of evangelical pastors who say it is wrong for preachers to endorse candidates from the pulpit.
Why It Matters
The tax-law provision now being challenged by politicians is the final clause of Section 501(c)(3), which provides that in exchange for tax-exempt status, a charitable nonprofit, foundation, or religious organization may “not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.” Since 1954, that language has served to protect charitable nonprofits and foundations – and the donating public. It helps to ensure that organizations dedicated to the public good in communities remain above the political fray.
Our society is better today, because 501(c)(3) organizations operate as safe havens from the caustic partisanship that currently is bedeviling our country, as places where people can come together to actually solve community problems rather than just posture and remain torn apart. Repeal or revision of the law would damage the integrity and effectiveness of all charitable nonprofits and foundations.
Congress first exempted from taxation organizations operating “solely for charitable, religious, or educational purposes” in 1894. Since then, Congress has added amendments expanding the list to include several other entities that can qualify for tax exemption. Congress also has added three major conditions: to receive the benefits of tax exemptions, those organizations cannot pay out profits (no private inurement), spend a substantial part of their activities lobbying, or engage in partisan politics (the provision at issue now). Organizations can do any of those, of course, but then they lose their tax exempt status.
Congress adopted the main part of the provision being challenged now in 1954 when Senate Minority Leader Johnson offered it as an amendment – which is why it is sometimes called “the Johnson Amendment.” Additional language was added to that provision in 1978 (the “or in opposition to” parenthetical): “does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.
Now, the President and some in Congress are seeking to remove the protection in federal law that keeps charitable nonprofits, including religious institutions and foundations, away from engaging in partisan, election-related activities, such as using charitable assets for political contributions and endorsing candidates for elective office. One bill in Congress, H.R. 172 , would completely repeal the “no partisan politicking” provision, subjecting nonprofits to demands/requests to get involved in partisan political electioneering, including using charitable, religious, and foundation assets to make political donations. Such a move would not only allow people to get tax deductions for making political donations, but also force the public to effectively be subsidizing that speech by others. Two other bills, S.264 and H.R. 781, would substantially weaken the law by allowing leaders of individual 501(c)(3) entities to endorse candidates for public office and engage in some partisan electioneering activities.
Efforts could also be made to attach a version or repealing or weakening of the Johnson Amendment to must-pass legislation such as appropriations bills. In late June, one such effort attached an extraneous rider to the Financial Services FY2018 appropriations bill (at Section 116) that would hinder enforcement of the Johnson Amendment against religious institutions, even when there are egregious violations. The House tax reform legislation, the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act (H.R. 1) passed on November 16, 2017, and included a provision (Sec. 5201) granting a partial exemption from the Johnson Amendment to all 501(c)(3) organizations.
In August, the Justice Department submitted a brief in Freedom From Religion Foundation v. Trump, defending President Trump’s Executive Order on the Johnson Amendment while raising questions about the substance of the Order. The government admitted, “The text of the Executive Order itself does not purport to exempt religious organizations from the political campaign activity provisions of § 501(c)(3), nor does it privilege religious organizations over secular organizations. Rather, section 2 of the Order merely directs the Government not to take adverse action against religious organizations that it would not take against other organizations in the enforcement of the § 501(c)(3) restrictions.” The Justice Department’s brief appears to contradict the President’s Rose Garden signing ceremony statement: “You’re now in a position to say what you want to say.” Parties seeking to politicize charitable nonprofits, houses of worship, and foundations are likely to see the Justice Department acknowledgement as a reason to increase pressure on Congress to change the Johnson Amendment.
The House passed tax reform legislation, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R.1), on November 16, 2017, exactly two weeks after the bill was introduced and without allowing any amendments to the original bill except by the Chair of the Ways and Means Committee. The vote was 227 to 205, with thirteen Republicans joining all Democrats in opposing the bill. The House-passed version included a provision, at Section 5201, that created a giant loophole in the absolute ban on nonprofit politicking by enabling all 501(c)(3) organizations to endorse candidates for public office when communicating “in the ordinary course of the organization’s regular and customary activities,” such as speaking on weekly or daily broadcasts or publishing election editions of magazines, and when spending “not more than de minimis incremental expenses,” an undefined term. The Senate passed its version of tax cut legislation in the early hours of December 2. Unlike the House, the Senate did not include any anti-Johnson Amendment language. The language that would have undermined the Johnson Amendment was excluded by the Senate Parliamentarian because it would violate the Byrd Rule, a technical Senate requirement.
Statements of Support for Nonprofit Nonpartisanship
- Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty
- Council on Foundations
- Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers
- Independent Sector
- National Association of State Charities Officials
- National Council of Nonprofits
- Religious and Denominational Organizations
- Rockefeller Brothers Fund
- The House tax bill unleashes a dangerous avalance of campaign cash, The Washington Post, Washington, DC, November 18, 2017
- Don't pull political campaigns into churches, Wisconsin State Journal, Madison, WI, November 15, 2017
- Keep political campaigns out of the churches, Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles, CA, July 25, 2017
- Our view: Johnson Amendment upholds separations we need, Citizen-Times, Asheville, NC, March 1, 2017
- Keep the Johnson Amendment, National Catholic Reporter, Kansas City, MO, February 18, 2017
- Trump’s promise to allow churches to back candidates is a bad idea. For everyone., Salt Lake Tribune, Salt Lake City, UT, February 4, 2017
- Churches aren’t being muzzled by the IRS, Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles, CA, August 14, 2016
Op-Eds and Letters to the Editor
- Congress, defend the common law and common sense of nonpartisanship, The Hill, Washington, DC, September 7, 2017, Karen Gano, Board President of the National Association of State Charity Officials, and Tim Delaney, President and CEO of the National Council of Nonprofits
- Permanently Driving Off Donors (and What You Can Do to Prevent It!), GrantStation TrendTrack, Minneapolis, MN, August 9, 2017, Tim Delaney, President and CEO of the National Council of Nonprofits
- These adorable puppies need your help to keep the nonprofit sector nonpartisan, Nonprofit = Awesomely Fun!, Seattle, WA, July 24, 2017, Vu Le, Executive Director of Rainier Valley Corps
- Don't Tread on Us: Keep Toxic Partisanship Away from Nonprofit Missions, Nonprofit Quarterly, Boston, MA, July 7, 2017, Tim Delaney, President and CEO of the National Council of Nonprofits
- Keep nonprofits nonpartisan, The Bismarck Tribune, Bismarck, ND, May 28, 2017, Dana Schaar Jahner, Executive Director of the North Dakota Association of Nonprofit Organizations, and Kevin Dvorak, President and CEO of the North Dakota Community Foundation
- Keep Nonprofits Nonpartisan, New York Nonprofit Media, New York, NY, May 3, 2017, Sharon Stapel, President of the Nonprofit Coordinating Committee of New York
- A Message to Congress - Keep Charities and Foundations Nonpartisan, NJSpotlight, Montclair, NJ, April 19, 2017, Linda M. Czipo, President and CEO of the Center for Non-Profits, and Nina Stack, President of the Council of New Jersey Grantmakers
- Keep partisan politics out of the nonprofit sector, The Hill, Washington, DC, March 22, 2017, Tim Delaney, President and CEO of the National Council of Nonprofits, and Vikki Spruill, President and CEO of the Council on Foundations
- Let’s keep nonprofit sector neutral, The Journal Record, Oklahoma City, OK, March 1, 2017, Marnie Taylor, President and CEO of the Oklahoma Center for Nonprofits
- Johnson Amendment Language Exclusion from Tax Bill a (Temporary) Victory for Nonprofits, Houses of Worship, and Foundations, National Council of Nonprofits, December 15, 2017.
- Nonpartisan Nonprofits to Political Parties: Join the Fight to Keep Partisan Politics Away from 501(c)(3) Organizations, National Council of Nonprofits, December 7, 2017.
- Senate Tax Bill: Extremely Harmful to Americans and Nonprofits, But Less Bad Than the House Version, National Council of Nonprofits, December 2, 2017.
- Nonprofits to Senate: Vote No on Tax Bill, Start Over, National Council of Nonprofits, November 29, 2017.
- House Passage of Its Tax Bill Demonstrates Congress' Disregard for Their Constituents and the Work of Charitable Nonprofits, National Council of Nonprofit, November 16, 2017.
- House Tax Bill Gives Political Churches a Multi-Billion Dollar Payoff, National Council of Nonprofits, November 7, 2017.
- Nonprofits, Nation Cannot Afford This Proposed Tax Reform Plan, National Council of Nonprofits, November 2, 2017.
- Now What: How the New Federal Tax Law Impacts Charitable Nonprofits, National Council of Nonprofits, January 11, 2018.
- An Open Letter to the Hundreds of Millions of Americans Who Have Worked for, Volunteered for, Donated to, or Benefited from the Work of a Charitable Nonprofit: i.e., every living person in the USA, Tim Delaney, Nonprofit Quarterly, November 29, 2017.
- Joint Letter Urging Senators to Vote No on Tax Reform Bill, signed by the National Council of Nonprofits, the Council on Foundations, and Independent Sector, November 29, 2017.
- Community Letter in Support of Nonpartisanship, Updated September 5, 2017
- Recommendations of the National Council of Nonprofits on Comprehensive Tax Reform, National Council of Nonprofits, July 17, 2017
- Nonprofits to Congress: Don't Politicize Houses of Worship, National Council of Nonprofits, July 13, 2017
- Letter to the House Appropriations Committee, National Council of Nonprofits, July 11, 2017
- Nonprofits Vigorously Object to Financial Services Subcommittee Efforts to Politicize Houses of Worship, National Council of Nonprofits, June 29, 2017
- Letter to the House Financial Services Subcommittee, June 29, 2017
- It’s “Go Time” For Protecting Nonprofit Nonpartisanship, National Council of Nonprofits, May 8, 2017
- National Council of Nonprofits Statement on "Religious Freedom" Executive Order, National Council of Nonprofits, May 4, 2017
- Statement of Tim Delaney Before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Hearing on Examining a Church's Right to Free Speech, National Council of Nonprofits, May 4, 2017
- Protect Nonprofit Nonpartisanship: Oppose Efforts to Repeal or Weaken the Johnson Amendment, Issue Summary, National Council of Nonprofits, April 11, 2017
- Nonprofits to Congress: Keep Partisan Politics Away from Nonprofit Missions, National Council of Nonprofits, April 5, 2017
- Protecting Nonprofit Nonpartisanship | Initial Commentary, February 5, 2017
- Protecting Nonprofit Nonpartisanship | Infographic, March 2, 2017
- Protecting Nonprofit Nonpartisanship | Common Questions and Answers, March 2, 2017
- Protecting Nonprofit Nonpartisanship | Executive Order, May 18, 2017
- Protecting Nonprofit Nonpartisanship | Legislative Challenge, May 18, 2017
- Protecting Nonprofit Nonpartisanship | Statements in Support
- Protecting Nonprofit Nonpartisanship | Editorials
- Protecting Nonprofit Nonpartisanship | Op-Eds
- Protecting Nonprofit Nonpartisanship | Additional Resources
- Resources on How the New Federal Tax Law Impacts Charitable Nonprofits